Home Blog Page 1529

Chewing and selling betel in public places illegal

0

BY TANNY.E.VAHI.

“Unlike those that are employed, we street venders too are struggling to meet the needs and demands of our families and for our daily survival.” This was the sentiment raised by a betel vendor in the Central Business District (CBD) of Honiara.

Almost every day Honiara city law enforcement officers will do their rounds to check for those selling betel nut illegally in the CBD of Honiara and most times, the venders will escape from the clutches of the law enforcement officers.

This has now become a common occurrence in the main CBD of Honiara.

However speaking to Island Sun, a betel nut vendor said he totally disagrees with the banning of the sale of betel nut and that there should be leniency on the restriction on the selling of betel nuts along the streets, provided there are proper bins in place.

He said unlike those that are employed, street venders too are struggling to meet the needs and demands of their families and daily survival.

“Not every parent is employed. It is hard for one person or a nuclear family or even two or three families to marshal the money, labour, or land for business on any but a very small scale.

“Like any other businesses, selling of betel nut along the street is one way of fast income generating product for us.’’ he said.

He further stressed that, they (betel nut venders) though do the activity, understand and are aware of the Litter Ordinance that outlines the duty of each business houses or individuals, who are must provide litter receptacles (rubbish bins) for the properties for the waste collection.

“It is not us; it is the behaviour of the consumers that cause lots of glitches to our environment. There are receptacles, to throw or spit our wastes, however public tend to ignore them and as what, we are the ones to be blamed and whilst, it is such behaviours that should be looked and strict with,” he said.

In the meantime, according to the Market Ordinance under Honiara city council Act, no person or individual is allowed to run a private market unless he/she has prior written permission from Council.

The councils also wish to further prompt the general public that chewing and selling of betel nuts in public places such as bus stops, public transport systems, government offices, schools, medical centres and other places that involve public gathering with the city is prohibited.

No person or individual is allowed to run a private market unless he/she has prior written permission from the Council.

Women’s increased income cause men to contribute less

0

BY LORETTA BRIGIDIA MANELE

A research study carried out in Solomon Islands has found out that women’s greater financial resources often enable men to lessen their own contributions to the household with some making no contributions at all.

This was expressed by Professor Richard Eves, of Australian National University’s Department of Pacific Affairs who was speaking at the Heritage Park Hotel under the Do No Harm Research Launch yesterday.

Whilst presenting key findings from the research study which took place in 2014 in Makira and Malaita provinces and Honiara involving 174 participants, he shed light on women’s experiences of having greater financial resources and how it affects the household.

Mr Eves explained that any connection between a woman’s economic empowerment and domestic violence is not always straightforward.

In this regard, he stressed that men and women interviewed pointed out a number of causes of martial conflict and violence, of which the most common one was linked to men’s consumption of alcohol.

Henceforth, Eves said that the research indicates that when women are more involved in greater financial activities, this often leads men to contribute less to their households where some tend to make no form of contributions at all.

“This allows men to use their money for their own personal consumption, resource depleting behavior that is often central to marital conflict.

“In such circumstances, when men contribute little either financially or by helping in the home, women’s increased income means a large increase in their work burden, now that income earning is added to their other customary duties,” said Eves.

Study differentiates income of women in rural areas and capital

0

BY LORETTA BRIGIDIA MANELE

ACCORDING to “Do No Harm: Understanding the Relationship between Women’s Economic Empowerment and Violence Against Women in Melanesia”, there are considerable differences between women in rural areas and the capital in how they depend on income generating activities.

Yesterday, Associate Professor Richard Eves from the Department of Pacific Affairs, Australian National University presented key findings of the above study.

He explained that the research project which took place in Solomon Islands in 2014 and focused on rural women’s income generating activities and savings groups as well as formally employed women in the capital.

Moreover, Mr Eves said that although there are considerable differences between the two research areas, there are also significant similarities such as the rigid adherence to unequal gender roles and discriminatory social norms.

He stressed that for women who were formally employed, most of them still had to secure ways of other income generating activities to support what they already earn to help sustain living conditions in the capital.

“Life for the women we interviewed in Honiara was perhaps more precarious than for the women in the rural communities,” said Eves.

In addition, he said that since access to gardening land is limited for women in the capital, they are more dependent on cash income than women in the rural areas who have sufficient land to plant crops for subsistence even if earning cash income is difficult.

“Several of the women we interviewed in Honiara who were forced to pursue other income generating activities to supplement their income, remarked how exhausted this made them and the negative impact this had on their family life, especially being unable to spend time with their children,” said Eves.

He furthers that despite the differences both parties have, what is common between them is the difficulties relating to generating income.

Eves noted that women’s lack of access to worthwhile markets and their exclusion from value chains illustrates that their efforts to extend their income generating activities into small businesses is curtailed.

Male participation vital to women’s economic empowerment interventions

0

BY LORETTA BRIGIDIA MANEL

WORKING with men to challenge gender inequitable behaviour and norms is crucial for economic empowerment programming.

Yesterday, under Australian Aid’s “Pacific Women Shaping Pacific Development” programme, a Research Launch took place at the Heritage Park Hotel centered on a research project called “Do No Harm: Understanding the Relationship between Women’s Economic Empowerment and Violence Against Women in Melanesia”.

One of the key speakers, Associate Professor Richard Eves from Australian National University’s department of Pacific Affairs shared key findings of the above study.

He said that the research findings have suggested key lessons which are; that women’s savings groups are a potential pathway for women’s economic empowerment, working with men to challenge gender inequitable behavior and norms is important, there is a need for community based gender transformative programmes and that women’s economic empowerment programming should adopt a “Do No Harm” approach.

Speaking of the second recommendation, he voiced that the Do No Harm research in Solomon Islands finds that is important that men are on the same track with women before economic empowerment interventions are staged.

Prof Eves added that it is vital that men are exposed to gender training at the beginning of any economic empowerment initiatives.

“The gender awareness training done by Live and Learn in Makira in preparation for the establishment of savings clubs was very helpful to men’s acceptance of women-only saving clubs,” he said.

Is environment awareness a matter for rural people in Malaita?

0

BY SAMIE WAIKORI

Auki

A Malaita man has questioned whether the director of environment’s office has been carrying out awareness to rural people on logging operations in the provinces.

Mr Aloysio Arukeni from Sihu village in East Are Are raised the concern saying that people need to be aware of the importance of their environment.

He said logging poses a major environment problem everywhere in the country, and environmental awareness in rural communities is lacking.

“To that extent, people continue to suffer with environmental impacts since they don’t know how to live-up when comes to those situations.

“Rivers, streams or the entire surrounding in which people live are polluted by logging operations.

“Because it’s quite difficult for everyone to stop logging, except only government can do.

“And logging is a form of development as government advocates and the biggest revenue the country collect comes from logging industry.

“That clearly shows logging will continue and it will also continue to cause environmental impacts to the lives of people.”

He said on that line Environment Division if responsible for that matter they must step-up and do their work as well.

Mr Arukeni demanded that whenever logging is proposed for any area, Environment Office must conduct awareness to tell people the likely environmental impacts they will encounter.

Saying this is so that people can make choices for their good and the good of their environment.

He said this is a serious concern and the office of the Director of Environment Division must do sometime about it.

Private sector, tuna and tourism key focus for IFC

0
Deputy Prime MInister, Manasseh Sogavare, shakes hands with IFC's Pacific head, Thomas Jacobs, during a meeting in Honiara

BY GEORGINA KEKEA

IFC’s Pacific head, Thomas Jacobs yesterday met with Deputy Prime Minister, Manasseh Sogavare.

IFC the International Finance Corporation, a sister organisation of the World Bank and member of the World Bank Group – is the largest global development institution focused on the private sector in emerging markets.

The government’s meeting yesterday with IFC is focused on the private sector as well as IFC’s support for the tuna industry and efforts to boost tourism.

Last year in November 2017, IFC has signed a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) with the Ministry of Culture and Tourism that aims to for a broader tourism programme in the country to boost tourist arrivals, generate tourism-related revenue, draw investments and create jobs.

Also in the tuna industry, in August 2017 IFC lends $10 million to National Fisheries Development (NFD) Limited to support sustainable tuna production and employment in the Solomon Islands.

The loan to NFD is IFC’s second investment support to the tuna industry in the country. The first being a $9 million loan provided to Soltuna Limited, NFD’s sister company.

This past week, the IFC’s Pacific head had been spent his visit on meetings with the government, business, and women.

His key focus is on IFC’s support for women in business, moves to boost the tuna industry and moves to spur tourism in the Western Province.

IFC’s work in the Pacific is guided by the Pacific Partnership. Australia, New Zealand and IFC are working together through the Pacific Partnership to stimulate private sector investment and reduce poverty in the Pacific.

Japanese friends experience Solomon Islands culture

0
Two visitors check out local materials display at the International wharf on Thursday

BY LYNTON AARON FILIA

HONIARA city was flocked yesterday with friends from Japan on board the Ocean Dream who were here on a mission to learn of the people and culture of Solomon Islands.

They learnt a lot about Solomon Islands’ culture during their visits to the National museum, Art Gallery, National Parliament, WWII site at Bloody Ridge and beaches in west Guadalcanal.

From a random interview with the Japanese tourists, they shared their experiences saying they were excited and enjoyed cruising around and learning new things about Solomon Islands.

Two visitors check out local materials display at the International wharf on Thursday

At the Museum, they were treated to performances from the popular Narasirato panpipe group and a dance group from the Isabel province. Many of the tourists could not resist the urge to dance to the traditional music.

Tour guides from Travel Solomons led them to see our country’s stored cultures, artefacts, histories and display of carvings and other local designs at the National museum and Art Gallery.

Many tourists returned to the boat laden with souvenir bought from the various vendors who sold a variety of cultural and traditional items.

Despite sun’s heat yesterday, friends from Japan still enjoy Honiara.

Travel Solomons engaged 47 local buses yesterday to transport the tourists to the country’s iconic sites while others hired taxis to the beaches for snorkeling.

Travel Solomons confirmed that 1,300 tourists came with the Ocean Dream Cruise ship, and all are Japanese.

MV Ocean Dream’s visit to Honiara is however not all about touring. A main component of their visit is to highlight and promote peace and grassroots interaction between Japan and host countries.

Stalls selling crafts.

They are also committed to campaign for the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs).

Since 2016, the Peace Boat’s ship also named as Ocean Dream has sailing with the Global Goals logo on its hull.

Each port visited, Peace Boat also conducts activities with International Campaign to Abolish Nuclear Weapons (ICAN) around the world, and the ICAN logo is also featured on the ship.

Women called to engage men against violence

0

BY MAVIS NISHIMURA PODOKOLO

WOMEN of Solomon Islands have been called on to help their men counterparts understand violence so that they can combat it together.

Permanent Secretary of Ministry of Women, Youth Children and Family Affairs Dr Cedrick Alependava made this appeal yesterday at the launching of the ‘do no harm’ research in Honiara.

He said violence has been increased in an alarming rate and it needs women to help men understand the violence so that together it can be combated.

“Most importantly steps to end this global problem (violence) are engaging everyone, including men and boys because violence against women negative affects men and boys in two ways: directly as survivors of violence and indirectly through their exposure to it.

“Engaging and helping men boys to understand violence as loving, supportive and involved husband and fathers is critical to achieving sustained transformational change,” Mr Alependava said.

He said that engaging men and boys in training to prevent violence helps other men recognise that this is not just a women’s issue and that we need everyone’s help to make a change.

Also incorporating men and boys to become stout agents and advocates to end violence against women and children is an essential element to solving a global problem.

Moreover he believes that his comment will at least bring everybody one step closer to engage men and boys and put an end to a problem that affects all of us.

Do no harm research in SI launched

0
Group photo of participants who witnessed the official launching of the Do no harm research launch yesterday at the Heritage Park Hotel in Honiara

BY MAVIS NISHIMURA PODOKOLO

Group photo of participants who witnessed the official launching of the Do no harm research launch yesterday at the Heritage Park Hotel in Honiara

‘DO no harm and turning research into practice’ workshop in Solomon Islands was launched yesterday at the Heritage Park Hotel in Honiara.

The research is mainly focused on understanding the relationship between women’s economic empowerment and violence against women in Melanesian.

It is a partnership between the Department of Pacific Affairs (DPA) formerly State Society and Governance in Melanesian (SSGM) at the Australian National University (ANU) and the International Women’s Development Agency (IWDA) funded by the Australian Aid programme’s Pacific Women Programme.

In this research, distinction between women’s economic advancement and women’s economic empowerment has been made.

Women’s economic empowerment refers to women gaining increased income, access to employment and other activities that see their resources increased.

This distinction is important, since many programmes claim to be working on women’s economic empowerment, but are, in fact much more narrowly focused on increasing women’s access to resources.

Present in the launching ceremony yesterday were Permanent Secretaries of Ministry of Women Children, Youth and Family Affairs( MWYCA) and of Ministry of Justice and Legal Affairs (MJLA), Representative from Australian Government and other donor partners and Women from Rural areas.

Santa Cruz mining issue

0

DEAR EDITOR, let me further reply to this ghost name Jim Khalir in his ill-fated witch-hunt campaign article on Feb 20. First of all Jim Khalir you choose to remain anonymous simply because you want to hide your foolishness and cowardice in the face of public loathe for mining in Santa Cruz.

I will undertake to make reply in paragraphs in response to your article for clarity.

Paragraph two. I must admit to you in no reserving term Mr Khalir, am the leader of this anti-mining. You picked on me by no mistake nor did I not promote myself as you basely claimed. You knew me am the person behind the entire anti-mining movement how dare you disown and question my standing in some portion of your column after initial admissions.

Paragraph three. You have not taught me nor taught anyone in the public media about prospecting and mining. You are alien to the subject of prospecting and mining. You professed to be a watchdog for mining issue in Nende. What a joke. I doubt you being a watchdog. Your use of alias name gratifies well your role as a sock puppet in the media to camouflage and propagate bad as if it is good, under veil. If you are a watchdog for people of Nende as you professed to be and do not pick up these flaws and abnormalities then two things are obvious to describe your finality on this subject and that is either you are sitting on the fence because you do not know anything about this matter as evidenced in your alien name or simply you are a die hard supporter of the company who will do anything foolish to appease your master.

Paragraph four. Yes. In the outset we need development. However not all developments are suitable for all style of geographical make-up of our land masses. Hence that why people ought to be properly informed to make prior-informed decision on what form of development is sustainable and environment friendly for their settings for the good of people today and for future generations.

Paragraph six. I did not mention the SAA subject of debate is for mining. No! The SAA is for prospecting. If there is anyone who is confusing himself and misleading public it must be you Mr Khalir for miserably failing to understand the entire process of mineral exploration and development in Solomon Islands and thereby propagating baseless and distorted views. People of Nende are fully aware of these processes starting from reconnaissance, prospecting, acquisition of SAR, due diligence in the conduct of SAA, and then eventual mining, having attended various awareness conducted at Nende and so it is pointless and irrelevant on your part to conduct your media lecture on something you knew little about.

Further to paragraph six above. The duration of disposition of LOI yes it is not limited and it rather decided on basis of resolution reached by MMB however my general assertion was on the basis of the short period of time your Company was prompt to come up with a SAA. The duration of LOI would be normally expressed in the LOI proper.

Nende land tenure system is quite complex and it is therefore unbelievable that your company can navigate its way through to settle a SAA in such a short period of time. The unfortunate outcome of this is what I have alluded to in my earlier article and that is (1) A lot of LOs their consents were not obtained – these are people whose land are being subjected to PL without their consent (2) Some LOs consents were hijacked – these were LOs whose signatures and names were on the company list but at no time did they sign up their land for such development. Basically someone forged their signatures and names (3) Some LOs their consenters withdraw their consent – these were LOs who have realised that something is not ok with the process and the development itself is bad for the place hence withdraw consent. I have list of this data to proof to you my claim.

Paragraph eight. I maintained the position. Though there were consultations it is not done properly. The 12 days is too short. The mandatory consultations were carelessly done. Some signatures were collected randomly and others were paid SBD200 in return for signatures. The signature were set as appendix to the Report by your company and presented to MMB and were purported to represent an overwhelming support for the project. Unfortunately these were cooked up lies by your company.

Paragraph 9. You are incorrect to say the SAA is standard all throughout. Standard under what circumstance? Certain terms of SAA are negotiated and subject to change depending on outcome of dialogue. Unless applicant can agree and negotiate settlement of SAA and the same submitted to MMB the applicant won’t be granted PL. Your further commentaries on this part were mere opinion and lack consistencies to statutory processes of MMA.

Paragraph 10 on PL 01/16. Again you mislead yourself. Further commentaries you put up on this part were mere opinion and lack insights of the processes. For clarity and in brief Mr Khalir this is the basics of what you are struggling to grapple with ; Stage 1 – Application for mineral prospecting pursuant to s20 (a – k) is submitted by applicant, stage2 – MMB – deliberate on the application s21 (1), stage3 Minister issues LOI s21 (2), stage4 Applicant or Company together with Director dispose with LOI – see s21(4) a – d, stage5 where successful dialogue occur at stage4 parties settle SAA – see s21(8), stage6 The company report back to MMB with the SAA – see s21(9), stage7 On recommendation of MMB – the minister thereafter issued PL.

A screening committee set up for purpose of s20 (4) and MM-Regulation 3D come into operation if area of tenement is put out on tender.

The mandatory consultation I make reference to which is very important and must be done thoroughly and in my considered view it is done properly by your company is stage 4 and they must do diligently activities set out in s21(4) a-d. Mr Khalir this mandatory process here in s21(4) a-d was not done properly. That is very messy so say the least. You must admit something is wrong hence why am building up momentum with people of Nende to challenge these many flaws.

The minister by strict adherence to this process does not sign PL instrument in the midst of the stages I set out you imply in contrary in your article.

Read this MMA on paclii – http://www.paclii.org if you don’t have access to this material so that you can make good and constructive judgement of where I stand on these many issues. But I must tell you there is no way you can deter and intimidate my stand with the majority of people of Nende to bulldozer your PL down the ditch. It is our constitutional right to seek redress in Court of law over what we see as unlawful and corrupt for which you Mr Khalir and your company are at liberty to challenge our contentions.

Ruddy S Oti