BY MELVILLE TITIULU
A trial involving a man accused of housebreaking has already started and is expected to complete by Friday 27th February at the Central Magistrate Court.
The defendant Mr. Patrick Pambo was charged with one count of housebreaking contrary to section 300 (a) of the penal code.
The offence carries 14 years of imprisonment.
He pleaded not guilty to the charge and the matter is now before Principal Magistrate Felix Hollison for trial.
The complainant is Mr. Philip Da’agi.
It was alleged that on the night of incident (19th September 2025) around 4am, the complainant and his wife were sleeping in their house.
The wife was sleeping in the living room facing the front door. The complainant was sleeping inside their room.
The complainant’s wife then heard someone poking their door trying to open it. The door was locked. Suddenly she saw the door being pushed opened.
She quickly identified the defendant as Patrick Pambo.
The defendant then grabbed a Samsung phone that was charging.
The complainant’s wife tried to grab the adaptor that was charging the phone and yelled out the complainant’s name for help. The complainant woke up and advanced towards the door.
He saw the defendant pull the Samsung phone from the adaptor before escaping. He also identified him as Patrick Pambo.
The complainant and his wife came out and also noticed the door of their canteen was opened. Their canteen was one meters away from the house.
They noticed that a phone and cash around $500 to $600 was missing. The Crown alleged the defendant also stole the phone and the cash.
The trial before the court on Monday centered around two issues.
Firstly, whether or not the defendant broke in and entered the complainant’s dwelling house on the 19th September 2025 and stole a Samsung mobile phone.
Secondly, whether or not the defendant broke in and entered the complainant’s canteen (shop) on the 19th September 2025 and stole a phone and cash about worth $500 to $600.
On Monday, the prosecutor informed the court on how he proposes to prove the case.
Prosecuting Counsel Oiofa, informed the court that he intends to call and rely on four prosecution witnesses (PW) and that five statements to be tendered by consent, within it has evidence (exhibits) entailing a Record of Interview between PC Stephen Melomi and Patrick Pambo dated 25th September 2025 and Photographic evidence and sketches of the house with view to establish the elements of the offence charge.
PW1 was called on Monday this week. PW1 is the complainant, Mr. Philip Da’agi.
PW1 was at his house at Rifle Range, White River area when the defendant broke and entered their house stealing a Samsung mobile phone, another phone and cash between the values of $500 to $600.
In Court, PW1 gave evidence on oath as to how he came to identify the accused, how long he knew the accused, how long he kept the accused under observation and the light or visibility at the time of identification.
PW1 gave evidence to the effect that he knew the defendant since 2019 as the defendant was a member of their community at Rock valley, Rifle range area, west Honiara.
The complainant said that he came to identify the accused when his wife and the defendant were wrestling with the mobile and charger that was stolen.
PW1 said he saw the defendant pulling the Samsung phone from the adaptor before escaping. That was when he identified him as Patrick Pambo.
PW1 continued to tell the court that he was able to identify the accused accurately because their house has a 2 feet bulb above the main door. Thus, he kept him under observation for about 24 seconds.
When asked by court how the visibility was like, he responded by saying, that the light was bright enough in the sense that if he were to read a book, he would be able to clearly see the words in the book.
Defence counsel Tukochi made objections to court on that – stating that the defendants’ responses are contrary to facts given to Police at the time of questioning.
But his objections were ruled out by Principal Magistrate and prosecution was allowed to proceed on as that line of questioning was relevant for identification purposes.
On Tuesday 24th February 2026, the court heard the Examination in Chief and Cross Examination of PW1.
It follows, the Examination and Cross Examination of PW2 and PW3 will set to continue today when the trial resumes.
Trial has been adjourned for today, Thursday 26th February 2026.
Oiofa Jeremy from the Office of Director of the Public Prosecutions is prosecuting the matter and Trevor Mark Tukochi from the Public Solicitors Office represents the defendant.
For feedback, contact: [email protected]
Editor: [email protected]