Home Blog Page 969

CDF Act to be reviewed

Permanent Secretary of the Ministry of Rural Development, Allan Daonga

By EDDIE OSIFELO

A TASKFORCE was set up to review the outdated Constituency Development Fund (CDF) Act 2013 and Regulations.

Permanent Secretary of Ministry of Rural Development, Allan Daonga confirmed this when he appeared before the Public Accounts Committee in Parliament yesterday.

PAC has scrutinised the $$3,905,951,360 budget for this financial year.

Daonga said work halted since 2015-2016 to review certain provisions of the Act and the guideline to implement the programme.

He said Government has set up a taskforce under the chairmanship of Ministry of Finance and Treasury permanent secretary to align with Public Finance and Management Act and CDF Act.

In going forward, Daonga said a Technical Assistance has completed work on certain recommendation.

He said the taskforce will finalise the outcomes and recommendation of the study and present to Caucus.

Daonga said after that, the taskforce will also consult with the Opposition Group.

Former Prime Minister and MP for Small Malaita, Rick Hou said the CDF Act is important for accountability and reporting

Parliament passed the CDF Act in 2013 with the objective to ensure that the management and disbursement of CDF is carried out with integrity and in a prudent manner with the view to safeguarding the interest of potential recipients of the fund.

$6.8M to each constituencies

By EDDIE OSIFELO

THE 50 Members of Parliament will receive a total of $6.8 million each in this financial year.

This after the government allocated $340 million to the 50 Constituencies under the Ministry’s Development Budget.

About $18.4 million was allocated under the Recurrent Budget for the ministry to meet its office’s expenses and other charges.

The Peoples Republic of China contributes $90 million of the portion, which each MP will get $1.8 million per year.

Ministry of Rural Development Permanent Secretary, Allan Daonga confirmed this when he appeared before the Public Accounts Committee in Parliament yesterday.

PAC is scrutinising the $$3,905,951,360 budget for this year.

Daonga said the ministry is embarking on implementing the National Development Strategy objectives and Government’s policy to deliver rural development nationwide.

He said this is so that all Solomon Islanders participate meaningfully to improve their social and economic livelihood.

Further to that, the ministry has allocated $1.5 million for the 50 constituencies to apply to engage their communities in income generation activities and infrastructure projects like roads and bridges to access markets and establish fisheries centres.

Daonga said the constituencies need to submit their work plans to get 30% of the $1.5 million for income generating activities and infrastructures projects.

He said the constituencies can also get support to plant kava, cocoa and copra and establish their storage facilities at rural level rather than rely on fees allocated under constituencies.

Member of Parliament for Small Malaita, Rick Hou said infrastructures are pressing need in rural constituencies.

He said the road he built in his constituency was estimated at $250 million.

“I spent $3 million to make the road.

“However, it is very expensive as you have to meet the costs of machines, trucks, fuels, labour and shipping freights,” he said.

Call for action against Mamae

1
Ousted City Mayor, Wilson Mamae appearing recently before the Public Accounts Committee

President of Solomon Islands Grassroot Organization Henry Wale Maneási is calling on the police unit called JANUS to investigate allegations against the ousted city council mayor Wilson Mamae.

He said investigation must continue because many serious allegations were raised under his leadership.

Maneasi said the issue of sale of land used by Ministry of Agriculture and Livestock at Ranadi and the failed Fire Extinguisher deal were classic examples.

“These issues must not be buried under the bridge even though Mamae has now left office,” he said.

Maneasi added the HCC office is not an office for leaders to serve themselves but to deliver services for people residing in Honiara.

He said Honiara residents have struggled to survived and it will not give justice to the people if Mamae and his cronies are allowed to walk away with their crimes.

Maneasi also appeals to the Solomon Islands Independent Commission against Corruption (SIICAC) to investigate the former mayor.

Five arrested for Jejevo incident now charged

0

BY JENNIFER KUSAPA

POLICE have finally charged the five men arrested for the incident which occurred on March 8 2021 at Jejevo, Katova Isabel province this week.

Police said the five suspects have been charged for the offences of going armed in a public place, wilful and unlawful damage and criminal trespass.

The men appeared at the Honiara Magistrates’ Court on Thursday after the High Court directed the Magistrates’ Court to hear the matter.

Police said the men were then released by the court on strict bail conditions to reappear at a later date.

This is in relation to the incident which occurred at Jejevo on March 8 2021

Police said a group of people armed with knives and axe went inside the Jejevo community and destroyed properties at the estimated value of $350,000.00.

Police called on people around the Katova area, especially communities around Jejevo, Furona, Jajao and Hurepelo village in the Katova District to remain calm and allow police to do their investigation.

Police also said that investigations may take some time as police want the community to allow the law to takes its cause and that taking law into their own hands will create another issue.

WWF and WPG strengthen ties

0
WWF and WPG Officials at workshop

BY BEN BILUA

WESTERN Province Head of Divisions, Administration and WWF have spent the last two days looking at areas where they can complement each other to deliver effective services.

Workshop Facilitator, Peter Ramo said WWF based in Gizo for over 20 years now took a new approach for greater collaboration and partnership with the Western Provincial Government (WPG).

He said the workshop focuses on Resource Capacity and Human Resource Capacity Development in an effort to build towards enhancement of community-based resource management.

Ramo explained that resource capacity development goal focus on how WWF and WPG can complement financial resource to achieve common goals in needed areas while the Human Capacity Resource development looks at how the parties can share expertise.

He said key provincial divisions includes Ministry of fisheries, Environment and Agriculture so as WPG administration are part of the workshop.

“Cooperation between WWF and WPG exists over the past 20 years and the workshop is facilitated for both the province and WWF to sit back and assess achievements and what needs improvement.

“WWF as an NGO facilitates this Capacity assessment to identify gaps that exists to improve its collaboration with WPG in terms of service deliveries,” Ramo said.

He said an action plan based on key indicators identified during discussions will be developed and compiled for reference at the end of the workshop.

Ramo reiterates that merging the capacity of the province and WWF is the way forward to achieve greater benefits in areas of community based conservation program.

Economy can improve if borders are reopened: PM

0
Honourable-Prime-Minister-receiving-his-first-vaccine-shot

PRIME Minister Manasseh Sogavare says the country’s economy could really be boosted if our borders are reopened.

However, he said our borders could only be reopened if the majority of people in the country are protected against COVID-19.

“The majority of people will only be protected if they are vaccinated,” Prime Minister Sogavare said in his nationwide address on Monday this week.

He said our goal is to achieve 100 percent coverage of our population above 18 years of age pending the WHO decision on those under 18 years of age.

Sogavare added if the majority are vaccinated, there is a chance that herd immunity will be established which will then provide some protection to those that cannot yet be vaccinated.

“I call on all of us to continue that same spirit of unity as we start the COVID-19 vaccination rollout program. Our ultimate success against COVID-19 is in our hands.

“I call on all citizens and residents in our country that are 18 years and older to be vaccinated when your time comes,” he said.

Prime Minister Sogavare said logistically, this could be a challenge.  

However, he said with God on our side, there are no challenges too great, especially if we face them together.

“My good people of Solomon Islands, we have made tremendous progress in our fight against COVID-19 over the past week and a half.

“We became the second Island country in the southern Pacific to receive and roll-out the AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccine,” he said.

Meanwhile, the Prime Minister said they have demonstrated their confidence in the AstraZeneca vaccine with the Prime Minister, the Governor General, and Cabinet Ministers leading the way in taking the vaccine during the first two days of the vaccination rollout program.

“As a country, we have pulled together in our joint endeavor to protect our country from COVID-19.

“That is what makes Solomon Islands special. We unite against COVID-19,” he said.

MAL to deliver on three main projects in 2021

0

THREE main important projects have been earmarked for implementation under the Ministry of Agriculture and Livestock (MAL) 2021 development budget, besides others.

Permanent Secretary Ethel Tebengi Frances highlighted these when her executive appeared before the Public Accounts Committee (PAC) last week.

The projects include;

  • The Establishment of a biosecurity treatment facilities that will facilitate exports including fruits, vegetables, root crops etc.;
  • The Establishment of an agriculture loan facilities at the Development Bank of Solomon Islands (DBSI) that will enable access to credit facilities or loans for all farmers around the country
  • The Establishment of a Ministry of Agriculture and Livestock farmer support services centre to introduce mechanisation to increase production.

Frances explained that the purpose to establish treatment facilities at MAL biosecurity land at Henderson means that anyone who wishes to export fruits, crops or vegetables can do so as Solomon Islands will have a place where their products can be treated before exported.

“Solomon Islands has never been for the past 40 years set up such facilities that is why our farmers cannot export fruits and vegetables because of biosecurity standards and requirements other countries have which we have to comply with.”

The PS further stressed that the establishment of an agriculture loan product or facilities at the DBSI is specifically tailored to address specific needs of the agriculture sector. Our people, let alone farmers, cannot access loan to boost or increase their production. This product will be designed to address the unique need of the sector weeding out stringent criteria commercial products that deny our people the opportunities to better their farm production and lives.

“This was already negotiated with the DBSI. Plans is to sign an MOU with the bank so that they will also conduct financial literacy training for our farmers so they learn simple financial management technique that will allow them to repay their loan and still enjoy a good return,” she said.

On the Establishment of a MAL farmer support services centre, she said the idea is to introduce mechanisation to increase production.

“We are in the 21st centuries but have not supported our people with machines that reduces the burden of farming. We are starting with Honiara and Guadalcanal then to the provinces. We now have secured a new lease with the Catholic Church for reestablishment of the former Field Experimental Station at Tenaru.”

The Permanent Secretary then thanked the Democratic Coalition Government for Advancement (DCGA) for its great wisdom for seeing the need to have its policies reviewed to be more refocused so resources are directed to where there is great need right now in the sector, being economic recovery and food security.

“The plan to establish biosecurity treatment facility received overwhelming support from the Minister and Office of the Prime Minister so it is very encouraging.

“As a government agency in the productive sector, our role is to support the government’s economic recovery efforts therefore our program this year reflects these new policy redirections so that there is more focus on exports, commercial farming and facilitation of trade,” Mrs. Frances said.

–MAL

EDITORIAL- A complete waste of our development funds

0

UP to $6.8 million will be dished out to each of the 50 constituencies this year.

That’s $340 million in total.

By our standard, this is a huge amount of money.

Used wisely and for its intended purpose, it would bring in the kind of development we would like to see in our rural areas.

But this is not the first time our constituencies have been allocated this huge funding.

Under previous budgets, Constituency Development Fund (CDF) has always been allocated the lion’s share of the money.

As the name suggests, this is money intended to develop our constituencies.

But how much of the money has been used to develop our constituencies?

How much of it has reached the people down there in the villages?

If you visit the constituencies now, you’ll notice the amount of money allocated for CDF each year does not equate what you see on the ground.

In fact, you’ll be surprise to note that there’s virtually nothing tangible we could speak of in the constituencies that is built out of CDF. Nothing!

If you see a school or clinic down there, it is either built by donors or through other funding.

Frankly, CDF has nothing to show for in terms of development in our constituencies.

So why are we still allocating a huge chunk of our development funds to CDF when it has nothing to show for nation-wide?

Are we so dump not to realise that CDF is a complete waste of our meager financial resources?

To allocate $340 million a year for rural development only to see no tangible development down there is beyond normal thinking.

Yet, year after year, the Government continues to entertain CDF. And keep allocating our development funds to a cause that brings no return.

The problem is CDF is controlled by our MPs.

As long as this practice continues, we will get nowhere with CDF.

In fact it will become a drain to our meager development funds.

VIEWPOINT- Candidates urged to campaign with plan & policies

Not copper/solar promises

TRANSPARENCY Solomon Islands (TSI) in its continuous advocacy focused at fighting corruption and promoting transparency, accountability and good governance, call on and remind candidates intending to contest the up-coming by-election for South Choiseul Constituency to show to the people of South Choiseul that, as a potential South Choiseul representative in Parliament you have the people’s needs at the forefront.

If you are a party candidate, you must convince the people of South Choiseul with your party polices or the platforms that you stood for, what potential development plans that can benefit the people, not business as usual of luring voters with material things like copper and solar panels.

Offering such goods in return of their votes.

TSI thanked the office of the Electoral Commission, the Democratic Coalition Government for Advancement (DCGA) and the Governor General (GG) for officially declaring 19th May as the date for holding the by-election for South Choiseul Constituency.

It is worth appreciated that the government listened to the cries of South Choiseul people after a year without a voice in parliament. Given the current financial hardship posed by covid-19 pandemic, DCGA is committed to hold the by-election for South Choiseul, that is commended and acknowledged.

During TSI’s recent visit to five communities in South Choiseul early this month, two questions were repeatedly asked by South Choiseul constituents, (i) When will they have their by-election and (ii) How can they access information about funds channeled through their representative (members of Parliament) to develop their constituency.  

Constituency Development Funds (CDF) is a catch phrase to the ears of citizens whilst at the same time very elusive.

It’s an issue that villagers are concerned about and rightly so because CDF is a funding that is purposely for the development of the constituency.

Through the information sharing sessions carried out by TSI in various communities throughout the country and most recently in South Choiseul, it is evident that there is an absolute lack of transparency and accountability with regards the use and disbursement of CDF at the constituency levels.

MPs and Constituency officers treat CDF as if it is confidential information and must not be shared. Such disinformation does not and will not achieve the purposes of what CDF was established for. CDF was established to help constituents generate income, to encourage and bring about development in constituencies and generally to improve the livelihoods of all citizens of Solomon Islands.

Despite the millions of dollars that have been disbursed under CDF, we are still hearing the same sad stories from our rural communities. (9th Parliament each MP received more than $19Million, 10th Parliament each MP received more than $26Million and this current 11th Parliament each MP already received more than $5 Million, however this will soon drastically increase).

A general view shared by constituents is that there is lack of development plan, and millions of dollars channeled through their MPs over the years till today does not reach the constituency.

Having no representative for over a year further disadvantaged the people of South Choiseul as some of their projects from the previous year have been halted after their MP was ousted through an election petition.

Transparency Solomon Islands through its advocacy programs for good governance shared with the people information about their civic and political rights and encourage citizens to vote wisely for candidates who campaign on good policies.

While the date for the by-election has been set for May 19th 2021, TSI reminds intending candidates to be mindful of the requirements and provisions of the Electoral Act during this campaign period.

People in South Choiseul are already raising concerns and asking clarifications about potential intending candidates who were going around communities distributing goods.

These concerns were raised by constituents from Wagina, Sasamunga and Loloko, stating that some people received solar panels, fuel and bags of rice.

Although there may be some other reasons behind the distribution of these goods, TSI cautions and reminds all candidates that a campaign is any activity that is intended, calculated or likely to affect the result of an election or to influence an elector with regards the manner in which he/she cast his/her vote.

As such any actions done outside the campaign period aimed at influencing voters is campaigning outside campaign period and an offence under the Electoral Act.

Now that campaign period is open, candidates must adhere to the provisions of the Electoral Act and must ensure not to commit offences listed by the Act like election bribery which involves directly or indirectly promising or offering  or giving benefits to someone with the intention of influencing the other person to either (i) vote or refrain from voting, (ii) vote in a particular way at an election; or (iii) influence a third person to vote, refrain from voting or vote in a particular way.

The people of South Choiseul have been without a representative for a long time and candidates must ensure not to carry out practices that will result in another by-election, the people deserve better.

Candidates who are registered with a political party must campaign under the party platform, policies and strategies, give voters the choice of voting based on party policies.

Do not bribe voters, remember your role will essentially be representing and serving the whole constituency, that means all constituents regardless of whether they support you or not.

Voters do not deserve to be bribed with promises of individual help of solar and iron roofing to be given prior to or after casting votes.

Once elected an MP is responsible for the whole constituency – not voters only.

The culture of vote in Solomon Islands over the years is “you scratch my back and I scratch your back.”

This practice of electing candidates based on what he/she gives the voter prior, during or after the election is a disease that give way for dishonest leaders to go into parliament and breeds corrupt government.

It is important for voters to understand that accepting gifts in return for your ballot is an offence, it breeds corruption and a candidate who wins through corrupt means will have little or no concern at all for the development of his/her constituency.

Obligations are focused at keeping and maintaining deals made out of corrupt conducts and bribes, uninformed voters who were promised riches expect MPs to provide everything for them.

Thus, this vicious cycle continues, “you scratch my back and I scratch your back” benefiting only a handful of people and ignoring the rest of the constituency and undermining development of Solomon Islands. Who suffers? The people.     

TSI in its continuous advocacy against corruption, engage in activities promoting transparency, accountability and good governance in communities.

TSI took note of the concerns raised by constituents of South Choiseul and the pressing need for wider reach, awareness and information sharing during this by-election period.

Thus, TSI calls on the Electoral Commission, together with development partners like the United Nation Development Programme (UNDP) to visit South Choiseul with the important message to educate people to vote wisely.

Being isolated, the constituents are susceptible to being influenced through promised gifts and voter buying, hence not freely making up their mind to go to the poll on May 19, because reports of some intending candidates and their supporters are going around to influence and lure people with gifts is disturbing and breaches the freedom of individuals to participate in a free and fair election.

TSI believed that the importance of voting party policies is the way forward to put in place the right leader at the right place in the right time.

Voting candidates who is only good in luring voters with copper, solar and other material things not only will put corrupt leaders in power, but as long as such practice of electing representatives continue, corruption will continue to thrive and citizens continued to be deprived of their rights to be represented in a sovereign nation, and development of this nation continues to be undermined.

VIEWPOINT- Pacific Way(s) and regionalism

Dr. Tarcisius Kabutaulaka in one of his recent visits to his beloved ‘Tasimauri’ region.

TARCISIUS KABUTAULAKA

THE tumultuous dispute over the selection of the Secretary General of the Pacific Islands Forum (PIF), which led to Micronesian countries deciding to withdraw from the premier regional organisation, provides an opportunity to re-examine the idea and vision of Pacific regionalism and the concept of the “Pacific Way”.

The Micronesian countries argue that according to an unwritten convention, it was their sub-region’s turn to fill the Secretary General (SG) position. Palau President Surangel Whipps Jr. said: “If we want to bring the Pacific together… let’s treat everyone equally – that’s why it’s so important that the SG be selected on a rotational basis [between Polynesia, Micronesia and Melanesia].”

The last time a Micronesian held the top regional position was 20 years ago.

By March 2021, the three US-affiliated states – Palau, Federated States of Micronesia (FSM) and Marshall Islands – had started the divorce proceedings. FSM President David Panuelo has said “the train has already left”, casting doubt on any hopes the Micronesian countries will reverse their decision. Nauru and Kiribati have not yet started the process.

Robert Underwood, Guam’s former delegate to the US Congress, referred to this as a “Micronesian revolt” and “Micrexit”.

He said Micronesian leaders “are justifiably unhappy” and that this “could have been avoided if Guam, the Commonwealth of the Northern Marianas and American Samoa were members of the Forum” just like the French territories of New Caledonia and French Polynesia.

Micronesian scholars, Katerina Teaiwa, Vincent M. Diaz and Julian Aguon highlighted the Micronesian countries’ shared historical experiences, cultural connections, diversities and leadership on issues of ocean policy, anti-nuclear weapons and climate change.

They say the PIF decision was a “strong showing of Micronesian unity that should not be underestimated.”

The Micronesian countries’ sense of hurt and their united and assertive response should not be underestimated.

Nor should we underestimate the disruptive impacts of this quarrel on the future of Pacific regionalism.

It could potentially weaken the power of island countries’ collective diplomacy, vital to achieving the South Pacific Nuclear-Free Zone Treaty, the US-South Pacific Tuna Treaty, the Biketawa Declaration and more recently in Pacific Islands leadership on climate change issues.

The Parties to the Nauru Agreement (PNA) is an example of collective diplomacy around a particular resource.

The dispute gives Pacific Islanders the opportunity to have frank and deep conversations about the ideas and values that inform Pacific regionalism, examine how we perceive and treat each other, and appraise the relevance and effectiveness of regional institutions, including Council of Regional Organisations in the Pacific (CROP) agencies and non-state organisations.

A central idea in this discussion is the “Pacific Way”, which is often touted as foundational to Pacific diplomacy.

FSM’s President Panuelo said the dispute “has planted the seeds of mistrust and a noticeable ‘erosion’ of honouring the Pacific Way.”

But what exactly is the Pacific Way? Is there a single Pacific Way or multiple ways? Does it manifest itself in the same way across the region and over time?

Who determines what the Pacific Way is? Does the Pacific Way embody both a collective regional identity as well as valuing the sub-regions? How does it offer a resolution to the current dispute? These are questions worth reflecting on.

When Fiji’s first prime minister, Ratu Sir Kamisese Mara, invoked the term at the UN General Assembly in 1970, he was referring specifically to Fiji’s peaceful transition to independence.

Over the years the term has been used to mean doing things in ways that are mutually respectful, inclusive, consultative, consensual, flexible and allow for compromise.

The Pacific Way is a set of ideas, visions and processes that are dynamic, reinventing itself under new contexts while simultaneously grounded to core values.

Over the years these values have been marginalised in favour of the increasing bureaucratisation of regionalism and regional organisations. The Pacific Way has become subsumed by bureaucratic requirements and processes. While such requirements are important, they need to be grounded in regional values.

Disagreements amongst PIF member countries is not new.

Greg Fry highlights past disputes, often around perceptions of Polynesian dominance.

Fry recounts his 1975 interview with Melanesian leaders who “felt that the Polynesian leaders looked down on them, making them feel like second-class citizens in the Pacific regional community.”

In these instances, leaders reached across this divide to create strong relationships, which saw the great collective diplomacy gains of the 1980s.

The current falling-out also illustrates how Pacific Islanders have appropriated the colonial divisions of Polynesia, Micronesia and Melanesia. Transform Aqorau, the former CEO of the PNA, states “there are already sub-regional groupings. The region is multidimensional, and constantly changing, and to assume that it should always be united, perhaps underestimates the emergence of strong national and sub-regional impulses.”

Despite these divisions, relationships continue to exist and are strengthened across these arbitrary and racialised boundaries.

The current quarrel gives Pasifika peoples the opportunity to have deep conversations about our collective regional identity, and our belongingness to and shared responsibilities to this blue continent.

At the same time we must bear in mind the dynamism, multilayered nature and complexity of Oceania, its people and the issues that concern us.

How metropolitan powers respond to and take advantage of the situation is also important.

The PIF provides a one-stop-shop for diplomatic courtship between its 18 member countries and territories and the 18 dialogue partners at a single venue.

It will not be the same without the five Micronesian countries.

Perhaps there are many in Washington DC, Canberra, Wellington and other metropolitan countries jostling to save Pacific regionalism.

It would be best for them to support, but not interfere or attempt to take advantage of the situation.

There are ongoing conversations amongst Pacific Islanders aimed at creating better understandings going forward.

This dispute, while disruptive, provides us the opportunity to re-examine the Pacific Way and chart new routes and new forms of Pacific regional partnerships.

* This article appeared first on Devpolicy Blog (devpolicy.org), from the Development Policy Centre at The Australian National University.

Tarcisius Kabutaulaka is Associate Professor and Director of the Center for Pacific Islands Studies at the University of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa. He is the author of “Mapping the Blue Pacific in a changing regional order”, in The China alternative: changing regional order in the Pacific Islands, edited by Graeme Smith and Terence Wesley-Smith, ANU Press, 2021.